Filing year 2026 §170(p) · OBBBA · Executes May 15, 2027 · Open science · No commercial interest

America just created $6.9 billion a year of new charitable capital. Nobody has built the pipeline.

A permanent federal deduction — §170(p), signed July 4, 2025 — returns real money to 150 million standard-deduction households for the first time, starting with refunds that land in spring 2027. Behavioral science says 60–75% of it dissolves into everyday spending within 90 days. Giving Tax Day is the pre-commitment architecture that redirects it back to the causes that earned it — automatically, at national scale, every year.

$6.9B
New annual social dividend, permanent — no sunset clause
150M
Newly eligible households — 90% of all U.S. filers
$120–440
Real refund range per household, arriving May 2027
92%
Of refunds settled by May 15 — the natural national moment
Countdown to the first Giving Tax Day · May 15, 2027
Days
Hours
Min
Sec
An open-science ecosystem, built with
Give More Tomorrow · Pre-registered RCT Universidad Loyola Andalucía · Behavioral research StockCrowd · Technology partner Altruismo Fiscal · Origin framework, Spain
Executive summary · One page, read in 60 seconds

The situation, the complication, and the resolution — in the order a decision-maker needs them.

Situation

The tax code has always co-invested in American generosity.

Every charitable dollar carries a hidden government match — but since 2017, 90% of households (teachers, nurses, service workers) were locked out of it by the standard deduction. §170(p) reopens the door: up to $1,000 single / $2,000 joint, permanently, from tax year 2026.

Complication

The refund arrives five months after the giving decision — unlabeled.

Research is unambiguous: 60–75% of tax refunds are absorbed into discretionary spending within 90 days (Souleles 1999; Parker et al. 2013). Without architecture, the $6.9B dividend lands in May and dissolves into rent, groceries, and summer travel by June. Every year.

Resolution

A December pre-commitment that executes itself on May 15.

Giving Tax Day pairs the GivingTuesday moment of intent with a Ulysses Pact: the donor pre-authorizes the redirect before the refund ever becomes "personal money." At a conservative 12% redonation rate, that's ~$840M/year of net-new charitable capital.

In one sentence: GivingTuesday is when America decides to give. Giving Tax Day is when the tax code makes sure it arrives.

Sizing the prize

From $6.9B of statutory dividend to $840M of capturable giving — every assumption on the table.

Consulting rule number one: never show a big number without showing how it shrinks. This is the honest waterfall, from the total dividend §170(p) creates down to the conservative central estimate a partner can plan around.

Exhibit 1

The §170(p) opportunity waterfall — annual, steady state

USD, filing year 2026 onward · conservative pilot prior (ρ = 12% central)

$6.9B
Total annual dividend created by §170(p)
−$4.0B
Absorbed into spending, no intervention (Souleles / Parker)
−$1.0B
Take-up friction: non-claimers, awareness gap
−$1.1B
Outside pre-commitment reach in years 1–3
$840M
Capturable at ρ = 12% — Monte Carlo P50

Source: IRS Pub. 1304; JCT scoring of §170(p) OBBBA; Souleles (1999); Parker et al. (2013); Giving Tax Day Monte Carlo model, 10,000 iterations (White Paper Rev 4.2, May 2026). Intermediate bars are illustrative decompositions; end points ($6.9B, $840M P50) reconcile exactly with White Paper Rev 4.2, §3–4.

Exhibit 2

Monte Carlo distribution — capturable capital

10,000 iterations · four-anchor triangulation of ρ

P10
$380M
P50
$840M
P90
$1.6B

Even the pessimistic tail (P10) exceeds the annual online volume of most single giving platforms. The distribution is published, reproducible, and open to challenge.

Why this is didactic, not promotional

The model publishes its own kill switches.

Falsification criteria are stated in advance: if §170(p) take-up falls to ≤15%, if no RCT arm shows a significant effect, or if CBO/JCT scores the redirect above $5B in behavioral cost, the model is invalidated — and we will say so publicly. Partners are invited to stress-test every number. See the evidence base ↓

Interactive · The one-minute lesson

Meet the silent investor in every American gift.

Most donors — and many nonprofit boards — have never seen the government's co-investment in their generosity written down. This form makes it visible in four lines.

Enter a donation. The form computes the §170(p) refund a standard-deduction household actually receives the following May — and what happens when a December pre-commitment redirects it.

"The refund isn't a windfall. It's the second half of a gift you already made."

Giving platforms: this is the widget your donors should see at checkout. Nonprofits: this is the number your thank-you letter should contain. Both playbooks below ↓

Form GTD-1Tax year 2026 · §170(p) OBBBA · Illustrative
Social Dividend Worksheet — standard-deduction household
1
Filing status
2
Charitable donations, calendar 2026 ($)
3
Marginal tax bracket
4
Deductible under §170(p) (capped: $1,000 single / $2,000 joint)
$—
5
Refund generated by your generosity — lands ~May 2027
$—
6
With a Giving Tax Day pre-commitment, redirected to your cause on May 15
$—
Illustrative only — not tax advice. Actual refund depends on total tax position; see IRS guidance on §170(p).
The mechanism · Behavioral design

Three biases work against the refund. One pact works for it.

This isn't a generosity problem — it's a design problem. The intervention moves the decision to the moment of maximum motivation and lets automation carry it across the five-month gap.

December · GivingTuesday moment

The Ulysses Pact

At peak motivation, the donor pre-authorizes the May redirect — before the refund exists as psychological "personal money." No willpower required in May, because no second decision exists in May.

MECHANISM: PRE-COMMITMENT (Thaler & Benartzi, Save More Tomorrow)
January · Acknowledgment

The Civic Investor identity

The receipt shows the household's Social Dividend estimate. The donor is no longer just a giver — they are a co-investor with the U.S. Treasury, responsible for where the match lands.

MECHANISM: IDENTITY LABELING · +15–25% FOLLOW-THROUGH (Bem 1972; Cialdini 2009)
May 15, 2027 · Giving Tax Day

Automatic execution

By this date, 92% of refunds have settled. The redirect runs on rails — Regulation E compliant, 14-day pre-notification, one-click cancellation through May 1 — visible and shareable like a GivingTuesday gift.

MECHANISM: DEFAULT EXECUTION · FRICTION REMOVED AT THE POINT OF FAILURE

The GivingTuesday complement, not competitor: GivingTuesday answers "will I give?" — the world's largest day of intent. Giving Tax Day answers "did it arrive?" — the missing second half of the giving calendar. One built the culture; the other makes the culture survive contact with a bank statement.

Stress-test it yourself

Don't take ρ on faith. Move it.

The whole model hinges on one parameter: ρ, the share of eligible refund dollars that get redirected. We triangulate it from four anchors (6–22% range, 12% central). Drag the slider and see what the market looks like under your own assumption.

Exhibit 3 · Interactive
Redonation rate ρ
12%
Annual capturable capital
$840M/year
6% · pessimistic anchor12% · central22% · optimistic anchor

So what — for you, specifically

Two audiences, two playbooks, one Monday morning.

Analysis without implications is trivia. Here is what a giving-software company and a nonprofit should each do this quarter to be ready when 150 million refunds land in spring 2027.

Playbook A · Giving platforms, CRMs & tax software

Own the checkout moment.

You already hold the two seconds that matter: the instant a donation is confirmed. §170(p) turns that instant into a product surface no competitor has shipped yet.

1

Ship the Social Dividend receipt

Add one computed line to every 2026 donation confirmation: "Your estimated §170(p) refund: $X, arriving ~May 2027." Low lift, immediate differentiation, and it seeds the identity effect.

2

Build the pre-commitment toggle

One opt-in checkbox (never pre-checked — UDAAP) at checkout in Nov–Dec 2026: "Redirect my refund to this cause on Giving Tax Day." Regulation E rails, 14-day pre-notification, cancel through May 1.

3

Instrument it as an experiment

Join the Give More Tomorrow RCT as a technology partner. Your A/B infrastructure plus our pre-registered design = the first published evidence in the category, with your logo on it.

4

Plan the May 15 activation

Treat Giving Tax Day like GivingTuesday's spring twin: leaderboards, shareable "my refund became a gift" moments, partner co-marketing. First mover defines the category.

THE PRIZE: at ρ = 12%, ~$840M/year of net-new processed volume — recurring, calendar-locked, and unclaimed by any incumbent today.
Request the platform one-pager →
Playbook B · Nonprofits & NGO federations

Turn your worst metric into your best.

77–81% of first-time donors never give again. §170(p) gives you a legitimate, valuable reason to contact every one of them twice more — with money attached.

1

Rewrite the thank-you letter

From January 2027, every acknowledgment for a 2026 gift should state the donor's estimated refund. You're not asking for money — you're delivering good news about money they're owed. Open rates follow.

2

Run a December "second yes" campaign

On GivingTuesday, offer the pre-commitment alongside the gift: "Make your refund a second gift — decide once, done in May." One decision, two donations, zero extra cost to the donor's December budget.

3

Adopt the Civic Investor language

Reframe donors as co-investors with the Treasury. Identity labeling lifts follow-through 15–25% in the literature — and it's free. Toolkit templates available from the initiative.

4

Claim your May 15 moment

Giving Tax Day gives your calendar a second national peak, five months after year-end. Report the redirected dollars publicly — "the tax code funded 40 scholarships" is a story local press runs.

THE PRIZE: a household giving $1,200 sees ~$264–440 back. Capturing even half of that per pre-committed donor beats the ROI of most acquisition channels.
Request the nonprofit one-pager →
Book a working session on your playbook →
The evidence base · Give More Tomorrow

ρ will be measured, not assumed: a pre-registered, tri-state field experiment.

givemoretomorrow.org is the open-science arm of the initiative — a 4-arm RCT (N≈2,000) across Minnesota, Arizona and Texas, running in filing season 2027. All results are published, favorable or not. The design descends directly from Thaler & Benartzi's Save More Tomorrow, applied to refund flows instead of paychecks.

ARM · SEED

First-time givers

Converts a one-time donor into a committed giver, attacking the sector's costliest failure: 77–81% first-gift churn.

EXPECTED ρ: 6–12%
ARM · COMPOUND

Recurring givers

Reveals the Treasury's hidden co-investment to already-committed donors, with salary-linked escalation over time.

EXPECTED ρ: 8–15%
ARM · BRIDGE

Intentional givers

Reframes the question from "what can I afford?" to "what impact do I want?" — working backward from net cost after refund.

EXPECTED ρ: 10–22%
Download the White Paper (PDF) Read the RCT design
Risks, stated before you ask

What would prove us wrong — and how each risk is held.

A recommendation you can't falsify isn't a recommendation. Every major risk carries a pre-published kill criterion.

RiskHow it's heldKill criterion
Low §170(p) take-upAwareness is the product: the Social Dividend receipt puts the deduction in front of every donor at checkout, not buried in filing software.Take-up ≤ 15%
Pre-commitment doesn't move behaviorFour-arm RCT, pre-registered, tri-state. The mechanism inherits a two-decade evidence base from Save More Tomorrow.No significant effect in any arm
Regulatory / consumer-protection exposureConservative by design: Regulation E + NACHA rails, mandatory 14-day pre-notification, one-click cancellation through May 1, explicit opt-in only — never pre-checked.UDAAP finding on the flow
Fiscal-cost backlashThe deduction already exists and is permanent; the redirect adds no new tax expenditure. Monitored against official scoring.CBO/JCT scores redirect > $5B
Perceived commercial captureOpen science, open source, zero founder equity. All findings published — including unfavorable ones.Any undisclosed financial stake
The window is 2026

The law is signed. The refunds will be sent. The pipeline must exist by December.

NOW · Q3 2026

Coalition & integration specs

Platform partners commit; Social Dividend receipt spec published; RCT partners locked for filing season.

Q4 2026

The December moment

Pre-commitment toggle live at checkout through GivingTuesday and year-end campaigns. The Ulysses Pact is signed at scale.

Q1–Q2 2027

Identity & filing season

Civic Investor acknowledgments go out; RCT fields across MN/AZ/TX; refunds begin settling.

MAY 15, 2027

First Giving Tax Day

Redirects execute nationally. Results measured, published, and turned into the year-two playbook.

One logic, three initiatives · FAQ

Every country has a silent investor. This is one architecture, three fiscal moments.

Giving Tax Day is the U.S. scale launch of a pattern born in Spain (Altruismo Fiscal, 2021) and validated through open research (Give More Tomorrow). The framework is portable — UK Gift Aid, Canada, Australia, corporate giving circles. Building a branch elsewhere? Tell us.

Is Giving Tax Day a commercial enterprise?
No. It's an open-science, open-source initiative. No founder or entity holds a financial stake, and all findings — including unfavorable ones — are published in full. Partners keep their own economics; the architecture itself is a public good.
How is this different from — or competitive with — GivingTuesday?
It isn't competitive; it's the missing half of the same calendar. GivingTuesday mobilizes the decision to give (December). Giving Tax Day makes that decision survive the five-month gap until the refund actually lands (May). Intent, then proof.
What about the ~16 million households that already itemize?
Same design flaw, different calendar: their refund also arrives months after the giving decision, unlabeled, and 60–75% of it is absorbed into spending. The identical December pre-commitment applies — Giving Tax Day's architecture closes the loop for the new 90% and the existing 10% alike. Itemizers account for roughly $229B of the ~$374B Americans give each year (Giving USA), so the itemizer branch is not a footnote.
Is the pre-commitment mechanism legal?
Yes, and deliberately over-engineered for consumer protection: Regulation E and NACHA compliant, mandatory 14-day pre-notification, one-click cancellation through May 1, and explicit opt-in only — the checkbox is never pre-checked, by policy and by UDAAP requirement.
What exactly would invalidate the model?
Three pre-published kill criteria: §170(p) take-up ≤15%; no significant effect in any of the four RCT arms; or CBO/JCT scoring the redirect mechanism above $5B in behavioral cost. If any triggers, we publish that too.
What partners are you looking for right now?
Three profiles: (1) giving infrastructure — platforms, CRMs, donor networks, nonprofit associations; (2) behavioral researchers — universities and labs studying giving behavior; (3) technology — tax-filing platforms and fintechs that can embed the decision moment into the real filing flow.
Join us

The $6.9B exists either way. Only one version reaches a cause.

In Scenario A, 150 million refunds land unlabeled and dissolve by June — every year. In Scenario B, the December decision and the May refund become the same decision, executed automatically. The difference between the two scenarios is whoever builds the pipeline in the next two quarters. That could be you.

Prefer email? hello@givingtaxday.org · Or start with the White Paper.

We reply within two business days. Your details are used only to respond — no lists, no newsletters, no commercial interest.